<em>Image courtesy of Yuliyan Velchev/istockphoto</em>

Solar Focal Point
Dedicated to Practical "Do it Yourself"
Solar Power Generation

SHOPPING CART
and OTHER DATA
CONTACT SOLARFP
SOLAR FP HOME
ABOUT SOLAR FP
SOLAR TECH COMPARISON
Passive and Active
Photo Voltaic
Thermal Electric
Indirect Solar
PASSIVE SOLAR HEATING
ACTIVE SOLAR HEATING
PHOTO VOLTAIC (One SUN)
PHOTO VOLTAIC (Many SUN)
THERMAL ELECTRIC
HYBRID THERMAL ELEC
INDIRECT SOLAR POWER
LINKS TO SOLAR SITES
On-line TOOLS
SOLAR LEXICON
SOLAR FP PROJECTS
ITEMS FOR SALE
News and Current Events

Solar Technology Comparison

There are many solar technologies available today which range from simplest to absurdly complex. This page tries to put some of these technologies into perspective and let you compare them. When you endeavor to capture the energy of the sun, it is best to pick a method that matches your skills, budget, and needs.

First, what are the most common solar energy technologies?

  1. Passive solar heating. Typically, this consists of some sort of heat reservoir that has been painted black. Usually this heat reservoir is contained in an insulating space. This approach is often applied in sun rooms, agricultural buildings or green houses.

  2. Active solar heating.  This is similar to passive solar heating except that the heat reservoir is manipulated in some sort of active way. The most common form of this technology is the heating of water for domestic hot water usage. Using a fan in a sun room or storing hot water for space heating all are examples of active solar heating.

  3. Concentrated Active Solar Heating. This uses some sort of mirror or lens system to concentrate the sun's light on the collecting surface. The surface then stores the heat from the sun with some sort of active system. This system is probably the oldest form of capturing the suns energy on a large scale. The concentration allows for higher temperatures to be achieved which offers higher Carnot efficiencies for mechanical engines. The higher temperatures also allow solar energy to be used in applications that exceed 60 degrees C. This includes hot water space heating, or water purification systems.

  4. Photo Voltaic Electricity Generation (One Sun). This uses semiconductor materials to directly convert the energy of light to electrical energy. The "One Sun" refers to the fact that light is not concentrated in this type of application. Flat solar panels are used that are generally pointed in the noon position of the sun. PV technology is likely the most common residential application of solar electricity generation. It is also one of the most expensive methods of solar electricity generation in terms of system cost per watt of power produced. Flat panel, one sun PV systems do not typically track the sun and thus have a fairly simple installation system.

  5. Photo Voltaic Electricity Generation (Many Sun). This technology uses semiconductor materials to convert the energy of light into electrical energy but uses mirror or lenses to concentrate the light on the PV panels. This systems can range for low power concentrators that put 10 suns or less on air cooled PV panels, to high power concentrators that put 100s of suns on sophisticad multi-junction PC panels that are actively cooled with water or sodium. High power systems are completely the domain of power generation companies while low power systems may be within the technical ability of some more capable "do it yourselfers". All concentrated systems need to track the sun to some degree. Parabolic trough systems need only track the sun in one dimension since the trough will maintain a focal point for a solar travel along the the longitudinal axis of the trough.

  6. Thermal Solar Electricity Generation. This technology is just a special corner of the "concentrated active solar heating" technology mentioned above. Here, a lens or mirror system is used to concentrate the light of the sun on an active solar collection system. The heat collected is then used to generate electricity. The electricity generation can very. Common forms of generation include high temperature steam engines, Stirling engines, semiconductor based thermal electric power generators (Seeback effect). This technology has the advantage that it can potentially supply power for some time after the sun stops shinning. Here the relatively low cost collection and thermal storage is used to power the more expensive generation systems around the clock which offers a theoretical four times utilization improvement over PV technologies.

  7. Hybrid Thermal Solar Electricity Generation. This technology is based upon its non-hybrid cousin except that it incorporates "cogeneration" techniques where the unused heat expelled after electrical power generation is then used for domestic hot water heating or space heating. These systems have a high degree of complexity, but are not particularly dangerous. Given the promise of a faster pay off, this technology may be appropriate for skilled "do it yourselfers". This is the type of system I will concentrate on developing in this web site.

  8. Indirect Solar Power Generation. This is a tried and true system of power generation where the power can ultimately be traced to the sun, but is directly based upon wind or upon water based gravity systems. Some wind is developed as a result of the rotation of the earth, but most wind strong enough for power generation is the result of uneven solar heating of the earth's surface. Likewise hydroelectric systems are powered by the earth's water cycle, which is in turn driven by solar evaporation. In that sense, wind power and hydro power are forms of solar power. Novel approaches to indirect solar can be experimented with by do it yourselfers as well. So called "solar towers" can be constructed that generate small amounts of electrical power in larger green houses. Evaporative solar towers can also be built to take advantage of the water cycle. Traditional wind based turbines are well within the skills of many DIY experimenters and emerging technologies, like piezo trubulance generators are reasonable DIY experiments. We will explore some of these here as well.

The table that follows is my rather subjective comparison of these technologies from a DIY perspective. The numbers which rate the costs, complexity and payback are simply relative assesments. Many factors will affect actual costs. Thus these figures are subjective guestimates based upon material costs and typical components. I'll try to add references and additional information as time goes by to make this comparison less subjective:

Solar Technology Initial Cost DIY Complexity Ongoing Cost  Payback Rate
Passive Solar Heating
Sun room addition 3 3 1 3
Space heating for shop or animal buildings. (Rooftop convection system) 3 4 2 4
Low temperature on-demand hot water heating (long black pipe to conventional DHW) 1 1 2 4
Active Solar Heating
Integrated Hot Water (convection tube) 5 3 1 5
Pumped Hot Water System (Rooftop collector remote hotwater storage) 5 4 1 6
Pumped Hot Water System (Rooftop collector Draindown or similar system) 5 5 2 6
Pumped Hot Water System for DHW and space heating (Rooftop collector remote storage with partial space heating) 7 6 2 7
Concentrated Active Solar Heating
Pumped Hot Water System for DHW and space heating (Rootfop collector with remote storage and full space heating) 7 8 3 7
Photo Voltaic Electricity Generation (One Sun)
Rooftop PV panels (uni-junction silicon to grid tie converter) 8 5 2 2
Rooftop PV panels (uni-junction silicon to batteries and inverters therefore assume grid unavailable) 6
Cost Offset by likely high cost of grid connection
6 3 5
Payback sooner due to increased reliability and high cost of alternatives
Photo Voltaic Electricity Generation (Many Sun)
Rooftop PV panels with tracking mirrors or fresnel lenses to grid tie converter 7 8 3 3
Early payback assuming concentrator can be fabricated at low cost
Rooftop PV panels with tracking mirrors or fresnel lenses to batteries and inverter 5
Cost Offset by likely high cost of grid connection
8 4 7
Early payback assuming low cost concentrator and high cost of grid connection
Thermal Solar Electricity Generation
Rooftop oil collectors with tracking mirrors or fresnel lenses to grid tie converter 5 9 2 8
Early payback assumes low cost concentrator
Rooftop oil collectors with tracking mirrors or fresnel lenses to batteries and inverter 4
Cost Offset by likely high cost of grid connection
9 3 9
Early payback assuming low cost concentrator and high cost of grid connection
Hybrid Thermal Solar Electricity Generation
Rooftop oil collectors with tracking mirrors or fresnel lenses to grid tie converter. DHW derived from cooling system 6 10 2 11
Early payback assumes low cost concentrator
Rooftop oil collectors with tracking mirrors or fresnel lenses to batteries and inverter. DHW derived from cooling system 5
Cost Offset by likely high cost of grid connection
10 3 13
Early payback assumes low cost concentrator
Indirect Solar Power Generation
Greenhouse and solar tower (pipe) 2 3 1 2
This system has the added benefit of a greenhouse which may be viewed or greater value than power generated
Wind turbine 5 4 4 2
Wind turbulence capture with piezo Unknown at this point

Some likely developments are sure to alter the view above. For example, if plug able electric cars become common, The demand for electrical power can potentially go up by factors nationwide. This would mean solar electric would probably pay off sooner because utility based electric would become much more expensive.

Advertisements